Soon after it became public, it became everyone’s Priority and started being used everywhere. A good example is JetBrains (IntelliJ IDEA) that releases its FREE software for developers of OpenSource projects.Sol Hess, a popular typeface designer, designed this font in the late 19302 that was released by Monotype Foundry. But I think the story of Blender ( ), which released the source code after reaching a financial goal, is fantastic. You can monetize with activities around the software, such as training, support and consulting, participation in potential future profits (as done by QT - ). It's possible to monetize even though it's FREE, I'm not saying Adobe should be FREE or OPEN, it's just an observation. This does not mean that you need to be FREE and neither Open Source, the focus is the disdain of Adobe with Linux. Obviously I contribute to the Free and Open Source world. Adobe do not block because Adobe do not want to, hypocrisy! The predatory industry allows piracy, it's like offering the child a cigarette. If it were not for the pirated versions of Windows it would not be so widespread, much less Adobe would be in all the corner courses. Hypocrisy on your part! For if it were not for "piracy" there would not be this software slave industry arresting people to OS. When I say "I used pirated" it does not mean that I have used it on my PC, there are many workers who are forced to use what is made available by companies. So you are a reason why Adobe needs to invest heavily into software protection products.ĭo you contribute to the Free and Open Source software?
Please make it happen! So many people are looking forward to it! I am sure that there are so many hitches to overcome when porting the whole suite to Linux, but in a few years it will be worth the struggle and resources spent. Otherwise, all other tools I use work on Linux nicely. I would also much appreciate it, because the only thing holding me back from switching to pure Linux in my workflow is that I pay for CC which is not available on the platform yet. It makes a lot of sense to port CC to Linux. There is also no need to go the so much more expensive way and buying Macs. There are many advantages of using Linux - no need for paying tens of thousands for Windows licenses, using the same equipment while reaching greater performance since Linux is consuming much less unnecessary resources like CPU power and other. It is definitely needed, or welcome, as so many companies could switch to Linux. The sole reason for why noone really complains about no Linux version about your products is that it is just not pronounced so much.
0 kommentar(er)
